Quae
1781755558
20260618
fre
www.quae.com-004740
02
01
01
004740
03
9782759241224
15
9782759241224
00
BA
02
160
mm
01
240
mm
02
10
01
02
Update Sciences & technologies
Cette collection publie des ouvrages en français ou en anglais faisant le point sur des avancées récentes dans les domaines des sciences et des technologies. Elle est destinée aux spécialistes du domaine.
01
01
Gender in research
Evaluation and knowledge production
1
A01
01
A2528
16
0000000080625246
21
0009-0003-2559-2356
Laurence Guyard
Guyard, Laurence
Laurence
Guyard
<p>Laurence Guyard , docteure en sociologie, est responsable des relations avec les communautés scientifiques à l’Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR). Elle y construit et déploie notamment un plan d’action Égalité ainsi qu’une politique Éthique et intégrité scientifique.</p>
<p>Laurence Guyard, who holds a PhD in sociology, is Head of Relations with the Scientific Community at the French National Research Agency (ANR). In this role, she is responsible for developing and implementing a Gender Equality Action Plan and a policy on scientific ethics and integrity. </p>
2
A01
01
A2530
21
0000-0002-4292-5680
Magalie Lesueur-Jannoyer
Lesueur-Jannoyer, Magalie
Magalie
Lesueur-Jannoyer
Magalie Lesueur-Jannoyer , docteure HDR en agronomie, est actuellement directrice régionale au Cirad. Elle y a coordonné le projet GenderSmart et travaillé sur les questions d’inclusion et d’égalité professionnelle.
<p>Magalie Lesueur-Jannoyer, who holds a PhD in agronomy, is a regional director at CIRAD. There, she coordinated the GenderSmart project and worked on issues relating to inclusion and gender equality in the workplace.</p>
3
A01
01
A2529
Angela Zeller
Zeller, Angela
Angela
Zeller
Angela Zeller, diplômée d’un master 2 en sociologie, a été chargée d’études Genre et du projet européen GenderSmart à l’ANR.
<p>Angela Zeller, who holds a Master’s degree in sociology, was a gender equality officer and in charge of the GenderSMART project at the ANR.</p>
01
eng
08
166
03
02
24
Izibook:Subject
Sciences sociales, politiques, économiques
24
Izibook:SubjectAndCategoryAndTags
|Sciences sociales, politiques, économiques|Réglementation, législation;Politiques. Expertise;Ethique et épistémologie;Histoire et sociologie
23
Izibook:Tags
Réglementation, législation;Politiques. Expertise;Ethique et épistémologie;Histoire et sociologie
23
Izibook:NewTags
Sciences sociales, politiques, économiques|Réglementation, législation;Politiques. Expertise;Ethique et épistémologie;Histoire et sociologie
20
Gender;Research;Women
10
2011
SOC032000
29
3087
01
302
03
00
<p>Whilst women’s representation in sciences is on the rise, this increase is not of the same scope across all academic fields, such as mathematics or computer science. In addition, the proportion of women decreases at higher levels of the academic hierarchy. </p><p>The persistence of these disparities and inequalities can be explained by the strength of stereotypes and ideological positions maintaining men and women in different and hierarchical social roles. These anchored unconscious stereotypes and gendered representations convey biases that can creep into evaluation processes, be it regarding careers or research projects, and they can also determine and guide scientific approaches. </p><p>Given the complexity of the phenomena leading to the (re)production of inequalities, what measures can be enforced? And how can we ensure their efficiency for the ecosystem as a whole? </p><p>This book—thought as the extension of the Gender in Research colloquium held in December 2020—brings together scientists and funding agencies to address these questions and provide answers. Drawing on a variety of perspectives, depending on whether they emanate from scientists or funders, the contributions offer analyses of different kinds, yet all grounded in a reflexive endeavour. </p><p>This diversity allows to reaffirm that equality is a matter for all stakeholders in the research ecosystem, and their ability to engage in dialogue and collaborate is crucial to guarantee the coherence and efficiency of their actions. </p><p>This book is intended for all the stakeholders involved in the conduct of research and/or its evaluation, regardless of the scientific discipline.</p>
02
00
<p>The persistence of disparities and inequalities in the representation of women in science can be explained by the strength of stereotypes and ideological positions maintaining men and women in different and hierarchical social roles. These stereotypes convey biases that can creep into evaluation processes, be it regarding careers or research projects, and they can also determine and guide scientific approaches. Given the complexity of the phenomena leading to the (re)production of inequalities, what measures can be enforced? And how can we ensure their efficiency for the ecosystem as a whole? </p>
04
00
<h5>Content</h5><h5>Introduction </h5><h3>Part I - Assessment and potential gender bias</h3><h4>Chapter 1. Gender and assessment of project-based research: the ANR’s commitments and measures </h4><h5>Project-based research funding and assessment issues </h5><h5>The ANR’s commitments and programmes </h5><h4>Chapter 2. Gender and evaluation: analysis of a funding agency </h4><h5>FRS-FNRS, the research funding agency in French-speaking Belgium </h5><h5>Current assessment procedures and their analysis </h5><h5>The feminization of grant holders over recent decades </h5><h5>Success rates and gender </h5><h5>Women under-represented at the top of the academic ladder </h5><h5>Under-representation of women in assessment processes </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 3. Assessing gender bias in the allocation of research funds </h4><h5>Research grants </h5><h5>Gender bias in the allocation process </h5><h5>EUROCORES programmes </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h3>Part II - Gender bias in knowledge production</h3><h4>Chapter 4. Gender bias in the production and circulation of knowledge in a development context </h4><h5>Invisibilization of women as research subjects </h5><h5>Gender bias in research and higher education </h5><h5>Marginalization of gender and women’s studies </h5><h5>Transforming power relations in the production and circulation of feminist knowledge </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 5. The sex and/or gender dimension in research projects. Analysis of a test phase at the ANR </h4><h5>Methodology </h5><h5>A very high response rate </h5><h5>Highly contrasting responses </h5><h5>Human resources considerations </h5><h5>The sex and/or gender dimension of research </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 6. Understanding resistance to gender equality: the role of ideologies in justifying the system </h4><h5>Gender stereotypes and the maintenance of social hierarchies </h5><h5>Ideology of intensive mothering </h5><h5>Neoliberal ideology and collective action </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h3>Part III - Case studies</h3><h4>Chapter 7. Regulation of sex determination and ovarian differentiation: implications for variations in sexual development </h4><h5>Gonadal sex determination, a key stage in mammalian sexual development </h5><h5>A single embryonic organ, the undifferentiated gonad </h5><h5>Control of gonad differentiation by antagonistic genetic cascades </h5><h5>The objectives of the ANR SexDiff project </h5><h4>Chapter 8. Using gender to improve understanding of links between agriculture and food in farming households </h4><h5>General framework </h5><h5>Gender in research content: design and implementation </h5><h5>Gender in research content: results </h5><h5>Operational implications </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 9. Improving crops using gender-specific consumer-oriented methods </h4><h5>Inclusive approach to the factors determining RTB users’ food product profiles </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h5>General conclusion </h5><h5>List of contributors </h5>
21
00
06
01
https://www.quae.com/produit/2052/9782759241231/gender-in-research
01
00
03
02
https://www.quae.com/system/product_pictures/data/010/007/681/original/03065BDW_Gender-research.jpg
17
14
20260617T155001+0200
01
P4
Éditions Quae
01
01
P4
Éditions Quae
02
01
00
20260702
19
00
20260702
01
WORLD
27
03
9782759241231
15
9782759241231
27
03
9782759241248
15
9782759241248
WORLD
08
Éditions Quae
02
01
00
20260702
03
01
D1
Quae
10
04
05
25.00
01
5.50
1.30
EUR
www.quae.com-004741
02
01
01
004741
03
9782759241231
15
9782759241231
06
10.35690/978-2-7592-4123-1
10
EA
10
02
CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 FR
02
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/fr/
10
01
02
Update Sciences & technologies
Cette collection publie des ouvrages en français ou en anglais faisant le point sur des avancées récentes dans les domaines des sciences et des technologies. Elle est destinée aux spécialistes du domaine.
01
01
Gender in research
Evaluation and knowledge production
1
A01
01
A2528
16
0000000080625246
21
0009-0003-2559-2356
Laurence Guyard
Guyard, Laurence
Laurence
Guyard
<p>Laurence Guyard , docteure en sociologie, est responsable des relations avec les communautés scientifiques à l’Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR). Elle y construit et déploie notamment un plan d’action Égalité ainsi qu’une politique Éthique et intégrité scientifique.</p>
<p>Laurence Guyard, who holds a PhD in sociology, is Head of Relations with the Scientific Community at the French National Research Agency (ANR). In this role, she is responsible for developing and implementing a Gender Equality Action Plan and a policy on scientific ethics and integrity. </p>
2
A01
01
A2530
21
0000-0002-4292-5680
Magalie Lesueur-Jannoyer
Lesueur-Jannoyer, Magalie
Magalie
Lesueur-Jannoyer
Magalie Lesueur-Jannoyer , docteure HDR en agronomie, est actuellement directrice régionale au Cirad. Elle y a coordonné le projet GenderSmart et travaillé sur les questions d’inclusion et d’égalité professionnelle.
<p>Magalie Lesueur-Jannoyer, who holds a PhD in agronomy, is a regional director at CIRAD. There, she coordinated the GenderSmart project and worked on issues relating to inclusion and gender equality in the workplace.</p>
3
A01
01
A2529
Angela Zeller
Zeller, Angela
Angela
Zeller
Angela Zeller, diplômée d’un master 2 en sociologie, a été chargée d’études Genre et du projet européen GenderSmart à l’ANR.
<p>Angela Zeller, who holds a Master’s degree in sociology, was a gender equality officer and in charge of the GenderSMART project at the ANR.</p>
01
eng
08
166
03
02
24
Izibook:Subject
Sciences sociales, politiques, économiques
24
Izibook:SubjectAndCategoryAndTags
|Sciences sociales, politiques, économiques|Réglementation, législation;Politiques. Expertise;Ethique et épistémologie;Histoire et sociologie
23
Izibook:Tags
Réglementation, législation;Politiques. Expertise;Ethique et épistémologie;Histoire et sociologie
23
Izibook:NewTags
Sciences sociales, politiques, économiques|Réglementation, législation;Politiques. Expertise;Ethique et épistémologie;Histoire et sociologie
20
Gender;Research;Women
10
2011
SOC032000
29
3087
01
302
03
00
<p>Whilst women’s representation in sciences is on the rise, this increase is not of the same scope across all academic fields, such as mathematics or computer science. In addition, the proportion of women decreases at higher levels of the academic hierarchy. </p><p>The persistence of these disparities and inequalities can be explained by the strength of stereotypes and ideological positions maintaining men and women in different and hierarchical social roles. These anchored unconscious stereotypes and gendered representations convey biases that can creep into evaluation processes, be it regarding careers or research projects, and they can also determine and guide scientific approaches. </p><p>Given the complexity of the phenomena leading to the (re)production of inequalities, what measures can be enforced? And how can we ensure their efficiency for the ecosystem as a whole? </p><p>This book—thought as the extension of the Gender in Research colloquium held in December 2020—brings together scientists and funding agencies to address these questions and provide answers. Drawing on a variety of perspectives, depending on whether they emanate from scientists or funders, the contributions offer analyses of different kinds, yet all grounded in a reflexive endeavour. </p><p>This diversity allows to reaffirm that equality is a matter for all stakeholders in the research ecosystem, and their ability to engage in dialogue and collaborate is crucial to guarantee the coherence and efficiency of their actions. </p><p>This book is intended for all the stakeholders involved in the conduct of research and/or its evaluation, regardless of the scientific discipline.</p>
02
00
<p>The persistence of disparities and inequalities in the representation of women in science can be explained by the strength of stereotypes and ideological positions maintaining men and women in different and hierarchical social roles. These stereotypes convey biases that can creep into evaluation processes, be it regarding careers or research projects, and they can also determine and guide scientific approaches. Given the complexity of the phenomena leading to the (re)production of inequalities, what measures can be enforced? And how can we ensure their efficiency for the ecosystem as a whole? </p>
04
00
<h5>Content</h5><h5>Introduction </h5><h3>Part I - Assessment and potential gender bias</h3><h4>Chapter 1. Gender and assessment of project-based research: the ANR’s commitments and measures </h4><h5>Project-based research funding and assessment issues </h5><h5>The ANR’s commitments and programmes </h5><h4>Chapter 2. Gender and evaluation: analysis of a funding agency </h4><h5>FRS-FNRS, the research funding agency in French-speaking Belgium </h5><h5>Current assessment procedures and their analysis </h5><h5>The feminization of grant holders over recent decades </h5><h5>Success rates and gender </h5><h5>Women under-represented at the top of the academic ladder </h5><h5>Under-representation of women in assessment processes </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 3. Assessing gender bias in the allocation of research funds </h4><h5>Research grants </h5><h5>Gender bias in the allocation process </h5><h5>EUROCORES programmes </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h3>Part II - Gender bias in knowledge production</h3><h4>Chapter 4. Gender bias in the production and circulation of knowledge in a development context </h4><h5>Invisibilization of women as research subjects </h5><h5>Gender bias in research and higher education </h5><h5>Marginalization of gender and women’s studies </h5><h5>Transforming power relations in the production and circulation of feminist knowledge </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 5. The sex and/or gender dimension in research projects. Analysis of a test phase at the ANR </h4><h5>Methodology </h5><h5>A very high response rate </h5><h5>Highly contrasting responses </h5><h5>Human resources considerations </h5><h5>The sex and/or gender dimension of research </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 6. Understanding resistance to gender equality: the role of ideologies in justifying the system </h4><h5>Gender stereotypes and the maintenance of social hierarchies </h5><h5>Ideology of intensive mothering </h5><h5>Neoliberal ideology and collective action </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h3>Part III - Case studies</h3><h4>Chapter 7. Regulation of sex determination and ovarian differentiation: implications for variations in sexual development </h4><h5>Gonadal sex determination, a key stage in mammalian sexual development </h5><h5>A single embryonic organ, the undifferentiated gonad </h5><h5>Control of gonad differentiation by antagonistic genetic cascades </h5><h5>The objectives of the ANR SexDiff project </h5><h4>Chapter 8. Using gender to improve understanding of links between agriculture and food in farming households </h4><h5>General framework </h5><h5>Gender in research content: design and implementation </h5><h5>Gender in research content: results </h5><h5>Operational implications </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 9. Improving crops using gender-specific consumer-oriented methods </h4><h5>Inclusive approach to the factors determining RTB users’ food product profiles </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h5>General conclusion </h5><h5>List of contributors </h5>
21
00
06
01
https://www.quae.com/produit/2052/9782759241231/gender-in-research
01
00
03
02
https://www.quae.com/system/product_pictures/data/010/007/681/original/03065BDW_Gender-research.jpg
17
14
20260617T155001+0200
01
P4
Éditions Quae
01
01
P4
Éditions Quae
02
01
00
20260702
19
00
20260702
01
WORLD
13
03
9782759241224
15
9782759241224
06
03
9782759241248
15
9782759241248
WORLD
08
Éditions Quae
02
01
00
20260702
03
01
D1
Quae
10
04
05
01
EUR
www.quae.com-004742
02
01
01
004742
03
9782759241248
15
9782759241248
10
EA
10
02
CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 FR
02
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/fr/
10
01
02
Update Sciences & technologies
Cette collection publie des ouvrages en français ou en anglais faisant le point sur des avancées récentes dans les domaines des sciences et des technologies. Elle est destinée aux spécialistes du domaine.
01
01
Gender in research
Evaluation and knowledge production
1
A01
01
A2528
16
0000000080625246
21
0009-0003-2559-2356
Laurence Guyard
Guyard, Laurence
Laurence
Guyard
<p>Laurence Guyard , docteure en sociologie, est responsable des relations avec les communautés scientifiques à l’Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR). Elle y construit et déploie notamment un plan d’action Égalité ainsi qu’une politique Éthique et intégrité scientifique.</p>
<p>Laurence Guyard, who holds a PhD in sociology, is Head of Relations with the Scientific Community at the French National Research Agency (ANR). In this role, she is responsible for developing and implementing a Gender Equality Action Plan and a policy on scientific ethics and integrity. </p>
2
A01
01
A2530
21
0000-0002-4292-5680
Magalie Lesueur-Jannoyer
Lesueur-Jannoyer, Magalie
Magalie
Lesueur-Jannoyer
Magalie Lesueur-Jannoyer , docteure HDR en agronomie, est actuellement directrice régionale au Cirad. Elle y a coordonné le projet GenderSmart et travaillé sur les questions d’inclusion et d’égalité professionnelle.
<p>Magalie Lesueur-Jannoyer, who holds a PhD in agronomy, is a regional director at CIRAD. There, she coordinated the GenderSmart project and worked on issues relating to inclusion and gender equality in the workplace.</p>
3
A01
01
A2529
Angela Zeller
Zeller, Angela
Angela
Zeller
Angela Zeller, diplômée d’un master 2 en sociologie, a été chargée d’études Genre et du projet européen GenderSmart à l’ANR.
<p>Angela Zeller, who holds a Master’s degree in sociology, was a gender equality officer and in charge of the GenderSMART project at the ANR.</p>
01
eng
08
166
03
02
24
Izibook:Subject
Sciences sociales, politiques, économiques
24
Izibook:SubjectAndCategoryAndTags
|Sciences sociales, politiques, économiques|Réglementation, législation;Politiques. Expertise;Ethique et épistémologie;Histoire et sociologie
23
Izibook:Tags
Réglementation, législation;Politiques. Expertise;Ethique et épistémologie;Histoire et sociologie
23
Izibook:NewTags
Sciences sociales, politiques, économiques|Réglementation, législation;Politiques. Expertise;Ethique et épistémologie;Histoire et sociologie
20
Gender;Research;Women
10
2011
SOC032000
29
3087
01
302
03
00
<p>Whilst women’s representation in sciences is on the rise, this increase is not of the same scope across all academic fields, such as mathematics or computer science. In addition, the proportion of women decreases at higher levels of the academic hierarchy. </p><p>The persistence of these disparities and inequalities can be explained by the strength of stereotypes and ideological positions maintaining men and women in different and hierarchical social roles. These anchored unconscious stereotypes and gendered representations convey biases that can creep into evaluation processes, be it regarding careers or research projects, and they can also determine and guide scientific approaches. </p><p>Given the complexity of the phenomena leading to the (re)production of inequalities, what measures can be enforced? And how can we ensure their efficiency for the ecosystem as a whole? </p><p>This book—thought as the extension of the Gender in Research colloquium held in December 2020—brings together scientists and funding agencies to address these questions and provide answers. Drawing on a variety of perspectives, depending on whether they emanate from scientists or funders, the contributions offer analyses of different kinds, yet all grounded in a reflexive endeavour. </p><p>This diversity allows to reaffirm that equality is a matter for all stakeholders in the research ecosystem, and their ability to engage in dialogue and collaborate is crucial to guarantee the coherence and efficiency of their actions. </p><p>This book is intended for all the stakeholders involved in the conduct of research and/or its evaluation, regardless of the scientific discipline.</p>
02
00
<p>The persistence of disparities and inequalities in the representation of women in science can be explained by the strength of stereotypes and ideological positions maintaining men and women in different and hierarchical social roles. These stereotypes convey biases that can creep into evaluation processes, be it regarding careers or research projects, and they can also determine and guide scientific approaches. Given the complexity of the phenomena leading to the (re)production of inequalities, what measures can be enforced? And how can we ensure their efficiency for the ecosystem as a whole? </p>
04
00
<h5>Content</h5><h5>Introduction </h5><h3>Part I - Assessment and potential gender bias</h3><h4>Chapter 1. Gender and assessment of project-based research: the ANR’s commitments and measures </h4><h5>Project-based research funding and assessment issues </h5><h5>The ANR’s commitments and programmes </h5><h4>Chapter 2. Gender and evaluation: analysis of a funding agency </h4><h5>FRS-FNRS, the research funding agency in French-speaking Belgium </h5><h5>Current assessment procedures and their analysis </h5><h5>The feminization of grant holders over recent decades </h5><h5>Success rates and gender </h5><h5>Women under-represented at the top of the academic ladder </h5><h5>Under-representation of women in assessment processes </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 3. Assessing gender bias in the allocation of research funds </h4><h5>Research grants </h5><h5>Gender bias in the allocation process </h5><h5>EUROCORES programmes </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h3>Part II - Gender bias in knowledge production</h3><h4>Chapter 4. Gender bias in the production and circulation of knowledge in a development context </h4><h5>Invisibilization of women as research subjects </h5><h5>Gender bias in research and higher education </h5><h5>Marginalization of gender and women’s studies </h5><h5>Transforming power relations in the production and circulation of feminist knowledge </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 5. The sex and/or gender dimension in research projects. Analysis of a test phase at the ANR </h4><h5>Methodology </h5><h5>A very high response rate </h5><h5>Highly contrasting responses </h5><h5>Human resources considerations </h5><h5>The sex and/or gender dimension of research </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 6. Understanding resistance to gender equality: the role of ideologies in justifying the system </h4><h5>Gender stereotypes and the maintenance of social hierarchies </h5><h5>Ideology of intensive mothering </h5><h5>Neoliberal ideology and collective action </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h3>Part III - Case studies</h3><h4>Chapter 7. Regulation of sex determination and ovarian differentiation: implications for variations in sexual development </h4><h5>Gonadal sex determination, a key stage in mammalian sexual development </h5><h5>A single embryonic organ, the undifferentiated gonad </h5><h5>Control of gonad differentiation by antagonistic genetic cascades </h5><h5>The objectives of the ANR SexDiff project </h5><h4>Chapter 8. Using gender to improve understanding of links between agriculture and food in farming households </h4><h5>General framework </h5><h5>Gender in research content: design and implementation </h5><h5>Gender in research content: results </h5><h5>Operational implications </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h4>Chapter 9. Improving crops using gender-specific consumer-oriented methods </h4><h5>Inclusive approach to the factors determining RTB users’ food product profiles </h5><h5>Conclusion </h5><h5>General conclusion </h5><h5>List of contributors </h5>
21
00
06
01
https://www.quae.com/produit/2052/9782759241231/gender-in-research
01
00
03
02
https://www.quae.com/system/product_pictures/data/010/007/681/original/03065BDW_Gender-research.jpg
17
14
20260617T155001+0200
01
P4
Éditions Quae
01
01
P4
Éditions Quae
02
01
00
20260702
19
00
20260702
01
WORLD
13
03
9782759241224
15
9782759241224
06
03
9782759241231
15
9782759241231
WORLD
08
Éditions Quae
02
01
00
20260702
03
01
D1
Quae
10
04
05
01
EUR